Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Comparable assertions #182

Closed
CiprianU opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #183
Closed

Comparable assertions #182

CiprianU opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #183

Comments

@CiprianU
Copy link

Would be nice to have stuff like: should be less than / should be greater than / etc. which can be applied on Comparable types.
@MarkusAmshove MarkusAmshove mentioned this issue Oct 20, 2020
Merged
@MarkusAmshove
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for bringing this up, the backtick versions slipped through when implementing those assertions for Comparable.

You should be able to use those now with v1.63 :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Apply Comparable refactoring to backtick assertions MarkusAmshove/Kluent
2 participants
@CiprianU @MarkusAmshove