-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Matching non-prop hypotheses of same type together? #5
Comments
Sorry @YaZko I missed your message a very long time ago. (setq coq-user-init-cmd
`("Set Printing Compact Contexts." "Set Printing Unfocused.")) This is not perfect though: variables need to be already consecutive. |
Ho sorry you are asking for a smarter move_up_types that would actually group things with same type instead of just moving things up. |
Thanks for the suggestion! This is still experimental. It needs to be called with example:
|
@YaZko I have just pushed into master a new version of the library, with a better solution to your feature wish.
|
Oh sorry I did not react to this earlier, but this looks great, thanks a lot! I need to jump back into the biggish proof that triggered this feature wish this month, I will test this new feature more thoroughly then :) |
Hello,
Your
onAllHyps move_up_types.
tactic is a life saver when dealing with big messy proofs. However, I really wish it would also organize together variables of identical types together, notably so that proof general would display their type only once.Do you know if that would be easy to implement? (unless it's already available and I simply missed it?)
Thanks,
Yannick
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: