Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Formula for Correction should be "de-adducted"? #41

Open
jmmitc06 opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Formula for Correction should be "de-adducted"? #41

jmmitc06 opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested solved The issue has been fixed.

Comments

@jmmitc06
Copy link

My reading of the documentation suggests that I should use the molecular formula of the metabolite for the instantiation of the corrector object; however, the observed molecular entity in the mass spectrometry experiment will be the adduct of the metabolite.

The documentation states:

'''
For instance, in the following situations, the formulas should include:

for MS measurements: all atoms of the detected ion

'''

So if I measure the proton adduct of glucose, should the formula for correction be "C6H12O6" or should it be "C6H13O6" or should I treat the adduct as a derivative?

I'm specifically looking at LC-MS data and only MS1 data.

@pierremillard
Copy link
Member

You should use the molecular formula of the detected ion for the instantiation of the corrector object.

If no atom of the "adduct" are also the tracer element, calculation results will be the same if you provide atoms of the adduct in the metabolite formula or as derivative. If some atoms of the "adduct" are also the tracer element, they should be declared in the derivative formula.

Regarding your example where the adduct atom is "H", if you have carried out a 13C or 15N labeling experiment, I would suggest providing the formula of the adduct as metabolite formula. If you have carried out a 2H labeling experiment, the atom of the adduct (H) should be provided in the derivative.

Let us know if this is not clear.

@pierremillard pierremillard added question Further information is requested solved The issue has been fixed. labels Apr 19, 2024
@jmmitc06
Copy link
Author

Thanks, this makes sense.

@jmmitc06 jmmitc06 reopened this Apr 19, 2024
@jmmitc06
Copy link
Author

Wanted to ask a follow up question. Does that mean that if I assume that the adduct cannot be labelled, then including its formula in the derivative field would always be safe? This is an assumption my tool makes for all analyses. So, if it is safe, this would make my code cleaner.

@pierremillard
Copy link
Member

I realized this point after having replied. You are right, if the adduct cannot be labelled, including its formula in the derivative field will be safer. In fact, this will be the safer & cleaner way of providing the adduct, I would recommend always including its formula as derivative.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested solved The issue has been fixed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants