Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for intellisense in experimental debugger #1076

Closed
1 task
DonJayamanne opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed
1 task

Add support for intellisense in experimental debugger #1076

DonJayamanne opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@DonJayamanne
Labels
area-debugging feature-request Request for new features or functionality
Milestone
2018, week 40 - O...

Comments

@DonJayamanne
Copy link

DonJayamanne commented Mar 14, 2018 •
edited
Loading

  • Enable tests in capabilities.test.ts
@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne added feature-request Request for new features or functionality area-debugging needs decision labels Mar 14, 2018
@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

Support how?

@brettcannon brettcannon added info-needed Issue requires more information from poster and removed needs decision labels Apr 18, 2018
@DonJayamanne
Copy link
Author

DonJayamanne commented Apr 18, 2018 •
edited by brettcannon
Loading

Debugger protocol supports this today. Its up to the debugger adapter to return the completion items.
We could either perform something as dirty as dir on the objects (I believe PTVSD does this) or use Jedi (other IDEs seem to use jedi in the debugger to provide intellisense).

@brettcannon brettcannon added needs decision and removed info-needed Issue requires more information from poster needs decision labels Apr 18, 2018
@brettcannon brettcannon added this to the June 2018 milestone Apr 25, 2018
@brettcannon brettcannon removed this from the June 2018 milestone Jun 4, 2018
@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne self-assigned this Sep 14, 2018
@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne mentioned this issue Sep 24, 2018
Closed
@DonJayamanne
Copy link
Author

@brettcannon Shouldn't this be back in the current sprint.
It never got done in the last sprint, i'd have thought such issues would automatically migrate to the following sprint.

Please feel free to remove from sprint if you think otherwise.

This was referenced Sep 27, 2018
Closed
Closed
Merged
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 1, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne

Labels
area-debugging feature-request Request for new features or functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2018, week 40 - October Sprint 1
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@brettcannon @ericsnowcurrently @DonJayamanne