[New preprocessor] The "tile_colorfix+sharp" is added #1435
Replies: 7 comments 4 replies
-
Note that after 1.1.196, tile_colorfix+sharp becomes ControlNet's new best method in upscaling images. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Getting The regular tile resample prep runs without problem. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
preprocessor tile_colorfix+sharp cant used with inpainting model get this error: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
good afternoon,i just try to use this funcion,but i met a question about the variation ,could u tell me what's useful? compare with sharpness,what's value i should put usually? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Would be grateful if you could point out how to use it in diffusers pipelines or how to implement it there? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
1.1.196 added "tile_colorfix+sharp"
This method allows you to control the latent sharpness of the outputs of ControlNet tile.
This preprocessor can prevent the Tile model from the tendency to create the somewhat blurred "harmonious atmosphere" in your upscaled images.
comparison 1
Input image (480x640)
Meta (Using T2I or I2I with 100% denoising strength, no extra upscaler/super-resolution, all results use same seed 12345):
1girl, best quality
Negative prompt: lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, cropped, worst quality
Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 12345, Size: 960x1280, Model hash: 8712e20a5d, Model: Anything-V3.0, Clip skip: 2, Version: v1.2.1, ControlNet 0: "preprocessor: tile_XXXX, model: control_v11f1e_sd15_tile [a371b31b], weight: 1, starting/ending: (0, 1), resize mode: Crop and Resize, pixel perfect: True, control mode: Balanced, preprocessor params: (64, 8, 1)"
tile_resample:
tile_colorfix:
tile_colorfix+sharp (sharpness=0.5):
tile_colorfix+sharp (default, sharpness=1.0):
img2img with 0.25 denoising strength without using any ControlNet:
comparison 2 (the difference for realistic image is less obvious)
Input image (480x640)
Meta (Using T2I or I2I with 100% denoising strength, no extra upscaler/super-resolution, all results use same seed 12345):
old man, best quality
Negative prompt: lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, cropped, worst quality
Steps: 20, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 12345, Size: 960x1280, Model hash: c0d1994c73, Model: realisticVisionV20_v20, Version: v1.2.1, ControlNet 0: "preprocessor: tile_XXXX, model: control_v11f1e_sd15_tile [a371b31b], weight: 1, starting/ending: (0, 1), resize mode: Crop and Resize, pixel perfect: True, control mode: Balanced, preprocessor params: (64, 8, 1)"
tile_resample:
tile_colorfix:
tile_colorfix+sharp (sharpness=0.5):
tile_colorfix+sharp (default, sharpness=1.0):
img2img with 0.25 denoising strength without using any ControlNet:
Note that all above results in this post are not cherry picked (they all use seed 12345). It is possible to get much better results using these preprocessors in other workflows (e.g., like using r-esrgan or other sr methods).
version
You need at least 1.1.196 to use it.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions