You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
In the spec, producers can identify trips by either 1) having a trip_id that corresponds to the trip_id in GTFS Schedule, or 2) by including all of route_id, direction_id, start_date, and start_time instead.
However, based on conversation in #gtfs-realtime (you can join the Slack here), option 1 (using trip_id) is easiest and most commonly used by consumers. Option 2 causes headaches and sometimes isn't supported by consumers at all. As a result, it would make sense to recommend that producers use trip_id in all cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As GTFS Best Practices (BP) are currently in the process of being merged to the specification, MobilityData is migrating outstanding issues and PRs from this repository to google/transit. Thus, this issue will be closed and further discussion regarding this BP should take place in google/transit. Please refer to Issue #421 for a more detailed explanation of the migration process and the proposed next steps.
With this, we’re hoping to bring more visibility to outstanding BP issues and to restart the discussion around them, so that any improvement that the community finds valuable could be carried forward.
In the spec, producers can identify trips by either 1) having a trip_id that corresponds to the trip_id in GTFS Schedule, or 2) by including all of
route_id
,direction_id
,start_date
, andstart_time
instead.However, based on conversation in #gtfs-realtime (you can join the Slack here), option 1 (using trip_id) is easiest and most commonly used by consumers. Option 2 causes headaches and sometimes isn't supported by consumers at all. As a result, it would make sense to recommend that producers use trip_id in all cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: