Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

process both min and max special constants #793

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

al-niessner
Copy link
Contributor

🗒️ Summary

The check for min/max special constants was written to return results immediately if either min/max was given. Had to alter processing to do both min and max.

⚙️ Test Data and/or Report

Automated unit tests below all pass

♻️ Related Issues

Closes #785

Al Niessner added 5 commits December 7, 2023 11:34
Parse the aggregations to query back for the lids that reference it. Then compress those lids in a set then report duplicates if the set is bigger than 1. This allows many lidvids to point at the same thing if they have the same lid.

Tested using the m2020 pixl data from harvest#143 after duplicating one element for the check to find. Runs successfully.
@al-niessner al-niessner self-assigned this Dec 11, 2023
@al-niessner al-niessner requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2023 18:07
@al-niessner al-niessner marked this pull request as draft December 11, 2023 18:07
@al-niessner al-niessner deleted the issuea_785 branch December 11, 2023 18:18
@al-niessner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Did not branch from main making this branch all messed up. Kill it and ignore it!

@nutjob4life
Copy link
Member

I've done that myself! 😁

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

validate catches valid_maximum but not valid_minimum
2 participants