Replies: 1 comment
-
My bad, units for Ci seem to be in mol mol−1, sorry for the confusion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am on the process of removing the hard-coded jmax25top and kp25top definitions and turning both into parameters. In doing so, I noticed that the default
kp25top
is defined askp25top = 18000 * vcmax25top
. It is very possible that I am missing something, but I wonder if this factor 18000 is 6 orders of magnitude too high...The original CO2 limitation for C4 grasses was first described in Collatz (1992), who defined kp = 0.7 mol m−2 s−1.
Later, in IBIS, Foley et al. (1996) converted kp to be a function of Vmax (kp = k0 × VCmax), by using Collatz (1992) value of VCmax (39 µmol m−2 s−1). In IBIS, VCmax is defined in (mol m−2 s−1), so that k0 = 17949 mol mol−1 ≈ 18000 mol mol−1.
However, in FATES, it seems VCmax is not internally converted to mol m−2 s−1. Also, the units for CO2-limited net photosynthesis (AC) are µmol m−2 s−1 and units for CO2 molar mixing ratio (Ci) are µmol mol−1. If these are all correct, kp should have units of mol m−2 s−1, because AC = kp × Ci. This means that k0 should be defined as k0 = 0.18 mol µmol−1.
As I said, I may be missing something or made a mistake in the unit checks, but I thought I should point this out because it seems GPP for C4 grasses is too high and this could be one of the reasons.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions