-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
faq.html
308 lines (304 loc) · 22.9 KB
/
faq.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
<div class = "row">
<h2>Frequently Ask Questions</h2>
<div class="panel-group" id="accordion">
<!-- expanding panel -->
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">
<h4 class="panel-title">
<a data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapse0">
<i class="fas fa-plus-circle"></i> What is the goal of CEFI?</a>
</h4>
</div>
<div id="collapse0" class="panel-collapse collapse">
<div class="panel-body">
<p>
The goal of the Climate Ecosystem and Fisheries Initiative (CEFI) is to provide information about past and future conditions for US coastal regions.
Models need to be at a sufficient resolution to represent general coastal processes (on the order of 8-10 km horizontal resolution,
although the grid may be of finer scale in the near future). In addition to historical simulation, seasonal forecasts (out to 1 year),
decadal forecasts (out to 10 years) and long term projections (out to 2100) will be made for several regions, including:
<ol>
<li>the Northwest Atlantic (US east coast, Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean)</li>
<li>the Northeast Pacific (from Baja California to the Chukchi Sea in the Arctic)</li>
<li>the Arctic</li>
<li>Pacific Islands including Hawaii</li>
<li>Great Lakes</li>
</ol>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- expanding panel -->
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">
<h4 class="panel-title">
<a data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapse1">
<i class="fas fa-plus-circle"></i> How to Access the Regional MOM6 Data?</a>
</h4>
</div>
<div id="collapse1" class="panel-collapse collapse">
<div class="panel-body">
<p>
Currently, the regional MOM6 output can be accessed through the PSL THREDDS server.
Users have the flexibility to choose their preferred method of data retrieval from this server.
Additionally, an alternative option involving AWS cloud storage is under consideration and may become available in the near future.
This option is currently undergoing testing. For direct access to the THREDDS server, go to the
<a href="https://psl.noaa.gov/thredds/catalog/Projects/CEFI/regional_mom6/catalog.html">catalog directly</a>.
</p>
<p>
<strong>
To access/download the data, the CEFI portal
<a href="https://psl.noaa.gov/cefi_portal/#data_access">model data access</a>
offer couple different options.
</strong>
<ul>
<li>A list of available variable tables in different coastal regions is provided in multiple format (html, json, and xml)</li>
<li>A data query generator to generate code to access the data through OPeNDAP</li>
<li>A data query generator to provide direct download</li>
</ul>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- expanding panel -->
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">
<h4 class="panel-title">
<a data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapse2">
<i class="fas fa-plus-circle"></i> Why regional MOM6? How is it different from other operational models?</a>
</h4>
</div>
<div id="collapse2" class="panel-collapse collapse">
<div class="panel-body">
<p>
Regional models have some benefits over global models, including being able to represent finer scale features more rapidly.
They can also be “tuned” (have their many parameter values adjusted) to better represent conditions in the region of interest.
While regional ocean models including the Regional Ocean Modeling System (<a href="https://www.myroms.org">ROMS</a>) and Finite Volume Coastal Ocean Model (<a href="https://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/Model:FVCOM">FVCOM</a>)
have been developed and used for many years, NOAA did not have regional ocean model capability. Building off the expertise in
developing global models, the regional version of MOM6 has been developed particularly with fishery and ocean habitat applications in mind.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- expanding panel -->
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">
<h4 class="panel-title">
<a data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapse3">
<i class="fas fa-plus-circle"></i> Are regional models the same as climate models?</a>
</h4>
</div>
<div id="collapse3" class="panel-collapse collapse">
<div class="panel-body">
<p>
The climate system is often simulated by coupling models representing different parts of the earth system together.
Common components include the atmosphere, ocean, sea ice, land, land vegetation, and ocean biogeochemistry.
Terminology varies depending on which components are included:
</p>
<ul>
<li>
<strong>Earth system model (ESM)</strong>: Earth system models couple all of the components listed in the previous section.
They are global and their dynamics are almost entirely emergent from their internal dynamics; in general,
the only inputs provided to these models are solar forcing, volcanic aerosols, and human-produced greenhouse gas emissions.
</li>
<li>
<strong>General circulation model (GCM, also sometimes called global climate models)</strong>:
These are similar to ESMs, but without ocean biogeochemistry and a simplified version of vegetation on land.
(In the past, the term “general circulation model” was used to describe just the atmosphere or ocean component models)
</li>
<li>
<strong>Atmospheric model</strong>: can be both global or regional where the sea surface temperatures are specified as boundary
conditions with an interactive land component.
</li>
<li>
<strong>Ocean model</strong>: Ocean models remove the atmospheric and land components and focus only on the ocean;
they often include sea ice and ocean biogeochemistry as well. These are less computationally intensive than fully coupled ESMs,
and also provide extra flexibility in experimental design since the atmospheric components are provided as user inputs.
They can be very useful to address research questions where the feedback of ocean dynamics on the atmosphere can be ignored or approximated via input setup.
</li>
<li>
<strong>Regional ocean model</strong>: A regional ocean simulates only a specific section of the globe.
This adds extra lateral boundaries to the setup relative to a global model, which introduces additional computational complexities.
However, the limited spatial extent allows simulation at higher resolution than a global model given the same computing resources.
Regional models also allow for tailoring of input model components and input parameters to capture dynamics specific to a region
that may not be applicable globally.
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- expanding panel -->
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">
<h4 class="panel-title">
<a data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapse4">
<i class="fas fa-plus-circle"></i> Is regional MOM6 the same as global MOM6?</a>
</h4>
</div>
<div id="collapse4" class="panel-collapse collapse">
<div class="panel-body">
<p>
<a href="https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/mom-ocean-model/">The Modular Ocean Model, version 6 (MOM6)</a> is the ocean component of the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
(GFDL)’s earth system model (ESM4). This model has been developed over several decades and is one of the world’s
premier ESMs. The MOM6 ocean model simulates physical ocean dynamics like ocean currents, temperature, and salinity,
and can be coupled to a sea ice model (SIS2) that simulates formation and melting of sea ice and an ocean biogeochemical
model (COBALT) that simulates nutrient cycling and lower trophic level dynamics.
</p>
<p>
While the global version of MOM6 has existed for many decades, the regional version has been developed much more recently
and is still being improved. Simulating open lateral boundaries is a complex task, and it took time to add these capabilities
in a manner compatible with the global MOM6 configuration. A description of how these boundary conditions are implemented can
be found in the <a href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/6943/2023/">documentation paper</a> for the northwest Atlantic implementation. Both the global and regional implementations use the same underlying code base.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- expanding panel -->
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">
<h4 class="panel-title">
<a data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapse5">
<i class="fas fa-plus-circle"></i> Are the boundary conditions part of a regional model?</a>
</h4>
</div>
<div id="collapse5" class="panel-collapse collapse">
<div class="panel-body">
<p>
A regional ocean model always requires external input to prescribe what is happening at the surface and lateral boundaries;
that input usually comes from the output of a larger- and coarser-scale global model or a reanalysis, which combines a model
with observations. These boundary conditions play a strong driving role in any simulation, and a regional model will inherit
some of both the skill and biases of its parent model/reanalysis. A regional model is more than just a high-resolution filter
for the parent model; it can resolve dynamics not possible at a coarser scale, and also can add new processes not present in
the parent (for example, extra biological complexity). This can alleviate biases from the parent model. But at the same time,
some biases can be amplified in the regional model output. The resulting features in a regional model will always be a combination
of the parent model’s dynamics and its own internal dynamics.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- expanding panel -->
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">
<h4 class="panel-title">
<a data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapse6">
<i class="fas fa-plus-circle"></i> What are differences between historical run, forecast, and projection?</a>
</h4>
</div>
<div id="collapse6" class="panel-collapse collapse">
<div class="panel-body">
<p>
Different types of regional simulations can be run by pairing a regional MOM6 domain with different types of parent
models/datasets for its atmospheric and boundary condition forcing. The terminology for these different simulation
types -- historical, forecast, projection, etc. -- is not standardized across the field and can be confusing.
Here's a brief summary of the CEFI simulations and our chosen terminology:
</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>
<strong>Historical simulations</strong>: CEFI's historical simulations attempt to simulate real-world conditions in the recent past.
They derive their input forcing from a global reanalysis. Reanalyses combine model dynamics and observations using
a process known as data assimilation. Regional historical runs can be used to measure the skill of the model compared
to observations. They also play many roles in research and ecosystem management: to fill in spatiotemporal gaps in
observations, provide a physical basis to drive fisheries and other ecosystem models, initialize forecasts, and many more.
Note that our historical simulations do not themselves assimilate observations; they are simply forced by a data-assimilative
parent model. Sometimes historical simulations are referred to as “hindcasts”.
</p>
<p>
Note on terminology: In some contexts, "historical" ESM or climate model simulations can refer the historical experiment
output of an earth system model intercomparison project (e.g., [CMIP6](https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016)).
Unlike a reanalysis model, these ESMs are not directly tied to observations on initialization. They usually start from
a simulation designed to bring the internal dynamics into equilibrium under pre-industrial conditions (i.e. letting the
model approach its long-term average climate). They do not assimilate data and are tied to specific time periods only by
prescribed greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric aerosols. A skillful ESM/GCM will capture real-world statistical variability
across interannual and decadal scales, but will not have a year-to-year match to the real world. For example, they will produce
warm or cold events like ENSO, but not specific heat waves when they occur in the real world. The CEFI suite does not currently
include this type of CMIP historical experiment simulation.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<strong>Short-term forecasts</strong>: Regional forecast simulations derive their atmospheric and boundary forcing from a global seasonal forecast model.
CEFI uses the seasonal simulations from [SPEAR](https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/spear/), GFDL's MOM6-based seasonal and decadal forecasts.
Global earth system model seasonal forecasts are initialized from real-world conditions, then integrated forward in time in a freely-evolving
manner for anywhere from a few months to a decade. The CEFI suite includes 1-year seasonal forecasts, initialized 4 times per year;
</li>
<li>
<p>
<strong>Long-term forecasts</strong>: Decadal forecasts that are initialized once per year and extend to 10 years will be added.
</p>
<p>
Forecast ensembles: Due to the chaotic nature of the climate system, very small differences in conditions at one
time can lead to large differences in future values. The SPEAR simulations account for this by running multiple
forecast simulations with slight differences in their initial conditions, producing an ensemble of forecasts that
can be used to quantify the uncertainty of predictions. The CEFI regional seasonal forecasts downscale 10 of these ensemble members.
</p>
<p>
Note on terminology: Forecasts are usually run starting from near-present conditions to predict the future.
But they can also be initialized from past conditions. This type of forecast is sometimes referred to as a
retrospective forecast/reforecast. These differ from the historical simulations because they are not tied
to real-world data during the simulation period, only at their initialization time. The primary purpose of
these simulations is to assess the skill of a forecast model by comparing the forecasts to real-world data
(or to a reanalysis or historical simulation).
</p>
</li>
<li>
<strong>Long-term projections</strong>: Long-term projections focus on predicting the change in the climate system over time scales of 100 years.
On these time scales, the conditions at the start of the simulation are much less important than in short-term forecasts.
Instead, changes in long-term drivers, especially the concentrations of CO2 and other greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere,
control the outcomes. ESM projections are a key part of Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects (CMIP), and encompass a wide
variety of simulations with different assumptions about the future trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions, land use, etc.
The CEFI suite will include downscaled versions of selected simulations across parent models and scenarios. These simulations will extend to 2100.
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- expanding panel -->
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">
<h4 class="panel-title">
<a data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapse7">
<i class="fas fa-plus-circle"></i> What is COBALT? And how is it related to MOM6?</a>
</h4>
</div>
<div id="collapse7" class="panel-collapse collapse">
<div class="panel-body">
<p>
Carbon, Ocean Biogeochemistry and Lower Trophics (COBALT) (version 2 <a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2019MS002043">COBALTv2</a>, with enhancements for regional MOM6)
is the ocean biogeochemical model associated with MOM6. COBALTv3 includes 40 state variables that simulate nutrient
cycling for carbon, alkalinity, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, silica, calcium carbonate, and lithogenic minerals,
as well as the food web dynamics of phytoplankton and zooplankton.
</p>
<p>
The COBALT source code is included within the MOM6 component, and when active there is two-way feedback between ocean
and biogeochemical state variables (for example, temperature influences many of the biological rate parameters, while
phytoplankton biomass impacts solar radiation reaching and hence heating the water column).
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- expanding panel -->
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">
<h4 class="panel-title">
<a data-toggle="collapse" data-parent="#accordion" href="#collapse8">
<i class="fas fa-plus-circle"></i> What is z* vertical coordinate? Why not use the regular height coordinate?</a>
</h4>
</div>
<div id="collapse8" class="panel-collapse collapse">
<div class="panel-body">
<p>
The regional MOM6 simulations use z* as the vertical coordinate. It’s essentially a height (z) based system but
shares some similarity with a terrain following (σ) coordinate system. Indeed, z* only differs from z when the
free-surface elevation is non-zero.The coordinate system transforms the moving boundary problem of the oceans free surface into a fixed domain.
</p>
<p>
Alistair Adcroft, A., Jean-Michel Campin, J.-M., 2004: Rescaled height coordinates for accurate representation of
free-surface flows in ocean circulation models, Ocean Modelling, 7, 3–4,269-284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2003.09.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2003.09.003</a>.
</p>
<p>
Note that this is the model coordinate system - output is archived at set depth levels.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>