Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding EFSOI to xml workflow generator #925

Closed
AndrewEichmann-NOAA opened this issue Jul 21, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Adding EFSOI to xml workflow generator #925

AndrewEichmann-NOAA opened this issue Jul 21, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@AndrewEichmann-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Change workflow/setup_xml.py to generate workflow to run EFSOI

Acceptance Criteria (Definition of Done)

Generates workflow that runs EFSOI tasks as before refactoring (on EFSOI development branch)

Dependencies

No current dependencies

This is required to have EFSOI functioning in global-workflow

@AndrewEichmann-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aerorahul @WalterKolczynski-NOAA

A general question: Certain ensemble tasks that are mirrored in EFSOI tasks (eupd, ecen, esfc, efcs, and epos) seem to be able to take a cdump of gdas or gfs. I have never seen these used with gfs - would the choice between gdas or gfs relevant to EFSOI?

@aerorahul
Copy link
Contributor

@AndrewEichmann-NOAA

The option to execute the perturbation update via the EnKF is operationally (default) done in the late (gdas) cycle. However, it can also be executed in the early (gfs) cycle, or both. This is controlled by the variable EUPD_CYC in config.base.

In PR #674, there were outstanding questions regarding duplication of the config files for EFSOI. Will you be able to address those?

@AndrewEichmann-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aerorahul

Yes, most of those now call the config files of their corresponding standard tasks.

@AndrewEichmann-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now in #674

@AndrewEichmann-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

Folding into issue #673

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants