Use of processR in FIMS/tests/concurrent #693
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
@kellijohnson-NOAA, no need to add {processR} to the DESCRIPTION file since it's not included in the {testthat} framework or run in any GHA checks. Tagging @msupernaw to confirm the availability of the {processR}, pretty sure it's a package he developed. I’d love to hear more about the goals of these files from @msupernaw and where you all think we should store the concurrent files. To me, they could be turned into a vignette if the idea is to share comparison results with developers or users. Right now, they’re not in any GHA checks since they aren’t written using {testthat}, and we often forget to update them with the latest {FIMS}. P.S. We do have one {testthat} test that checks if FIMS runs in parallel with {snowfall}, so that’s covered! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
{processR} is not actually on CRAN, instead another package called {processR} is archived on CRAN.
Second, {processR} is beneficial to think about using in FIMS in the future because
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I was looking at updating the DESCRIPTION file to update some of the packages that are included. One of them is {processR}. This package is being used in tests/concurrent but it is not listed in the DESCRIPTION file. I was going to add it to Suggests but it is currently not available on CRAN, where it was taken off 2023-02-02 because it requires archived {predict3d}. Is there a different package that we can use instead of {processR}? Because this is in tests/concurrent should I just not worry about adding it to the DESCRIPTION file in suggests? Thanks for the discussion about this 😉. @Bai-Li-NOAA
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions