You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note that this issue requires #566 to be complete first.
During the review of #566, it was suggested (here, here, and here at least, and possibly elsewhere) to remove Path from the group of possible types for items examined by ItemDataDomainDetector objects. This seems like a solid idea but will have some further implications and considerations (e.g., should we do the same for bytes?). As such, that task is receiving this issue of its own.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note that this issue requires #566 to be complete first.
During the review of #566, it was suggested (here, here, and here at least, and possibly elsewhere) to remove Path from the group of possible types for items examined by ItemDataDomainDetector objects. This seems like a solid idea but will have some further implications and considerations (e.g., should we do the same for
bytes
?). As such, that task is receiving this issue of its own.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: