Where should layout visualizations live? #789
Replies: 5 comments 1 reply
-
I vote to strike option 3 on the grounds of simplicity. Moving the visualization tools out of both means more work to keep them all in sync (mostly releases and when either FLORIS or FLASC change an API now you have to go change another repo). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My vote is option 2. FLASC is really meant for SCADA analysis. The visualization functions in FLASC are not limited to that purpose, but really are generic functions that can be used for any FLORIS application. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I like Option 2 as well. It seems like the layout and power and thrust curve plotting functions in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Seems like we have a good consensus! @rafmudaf I have a technical question for you, this is a change which effects two repos (floris and flasc), is the right way to track this change seperate issues in each repo which link to each other? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
#805 moved layout visualizations from FLASC to FLORIS |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Currently there are layout visualization codes in both FLORIS and FLASC, with the FLASC versions having more capability over the FLORIS version. @misi9170 and I were discussing how we might manage this and we had a few options in mind:
Tagging a few folks to get your comments: @misi9170 @ejsimley @rafmudaf @bayc @christiannvaughn @Bartdoekemeijer
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions