-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Time_series_analysis-forcast.py
527 lines (307 loc) · 12.8 KB
/
Time_series_analysis-forcast.py
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
#!/usr/bin/env python
# coding: utf-8
# # Minimum Daily Temperature Time Series Analysis
# ### About Project -
#
#
# the main motive of the TSA is to predict future values based on the past behavior.
# Generally Future values are influenced by past happening. It might be a trend or Seasonality
# or both or cyclic. So I am here, depends upon the curve happened over time I will find out the
# upcoming period observations.
#
# ## Import the Liabraries
# In[1]:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from statsmodels.tsa.seasonal import seasonal_decompose #checking decomponents of df
from statsmodels.tsa.api import adfuller #checking stationary
from statsmodels.graphics.tsaplots import plot_pacf,plot_acf #mapping
from statsmodels.tsa.statespace.sarimax import SARIMAX #seassonal forecasting
import pmdarima as pm #auto forecasing
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error,mean_absolute_error,mean_absolute_percentage_error #errorcheck
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')
# ## Reading Dataset
# In[2]:
df = pd.read_csv("C:\\Users\\Manikanta\\Downloads\\daily-minimum-temperatures-in-me.csv")
# In[3]:
df.head() # first 5 rows
# In[4]:
df.info()
#checking d-type of each column inthe dataset
#here we can see no.of rows and columns.
#data types are not correct. we should change at data cleaning part
# In[5]:
df.isnull().sum() #checking for null values
# ## Data Cleaning (Data Wrangling)
#
# 1. Removing the Unnecessary columns which are not required for my series analysis
#
# 2. Converting the data type, default to meaningful.
# In[6]:
df.columns = ['Date','MT'] #i want to change column name because of length of the header.
df.head() #view
# In[7]:
df['Date'] = pd.to_datetime(df['Date']) #coverting into datetime d-type
# In[8]:
df['MT'].unique() #checking the each obseration because it column has string values.
# In[9]:
df[df['MT'].str.startswith('?')] #filtered the string values in mt column
# In[10]:
#removing the '?' special character. and converted into float d-type
df['MT'] = df['MT'].str.replace('[\?\,]',"").astype('float')
# In[11]:
df.info() #then checking once again the d-type
# ## Skewness and Deducting Outliers
# In[12]:
print('Skewness :{:.4f}'.format(df.MT.skew()))
plt.figure(figsize=(15,6))
plt.subplot(1,2,1)
df.MT.hist(grid=False)
plt.subplot(1,2,2)
sns.boxplot(x=df.MT)
plt.show()
# ### Observations :
#
# . skewness number is not much higher.
#
# . Through hist-plot, we can see a normal distribution.
#
# . Meanwhile, through boxplots, we can observe a few outliers at the high end.
#
# . with help of standard deviation, we can find those outliers in which category they fall under 2nd or 3rd+ sd
#
# # ____
# ## Time-Series Analysis
# In[13]:
# for time series analysis we need to put datatime d-type as index of data frame.
df.set_index('Date',inplace=True)
# In[14]:
#By using the panda's plot we can observe the behavior of the curve happened over time.
plt.rcParams.update({'figure.figsize':(20,5)})
df.plot();
# In[15]:
#step-3 Modeling
# here this is your choice we can forecast hourly daily, monthly, or Quarterly
# so I want to forecast the values monthly
df = df.resample('m').mean()
# In[16]:
df.plot(grid=True); #see now we can find trend and variance and seasonality easily
# In[17]:
#here by the
#here with the help of decomponents of series, we can know if series has trend or seasonality or both
add_m = seasonal_decompose(df,model='addition',extrapolate_trend='freq')
mult_m = seasonal_decompose(df,model='multiplicative',extrapolate_trend='freq')
plt.rcParams.update({'figure.figsize':(20,10)})
add_m.plot();
# In[18]:
mult_m.plot();
# ### Observations:
#
# 1. we can check both addition and multiplicative types. In both plots, it is appearing
# The Series has seasonality and variance not trend.
#
# 2. However, we need to find which type is suitable for the Series by checking the resid
#
# # ____
# In[19]:
print('Skewness of addition type : {:.4f}'.format(add_m.resid.skew()))
print('Skewness of multiplicative : {:.4f}'.format(mult_m.resid.skew()))
plt.figure(figsize=(15,6))
plt.subplot(1,2,1)
add_m.resid.plot(kind='kde')
plt.subplot(1,2,2)
mult_m.resid.plot(kind='kde')
plt.show()
# #### there we can observe multiplicative model does not have more skewness than another type. and also, density looks pretty well in the multiplicative model
#
#
# # ____
# ### Checking Stationarity
#
# #### A time series is stationary if it satisfies the following three conditions.
#
# 1. Mean of the series over time is constant
# 2. Variance of the series over time is constant.
# 3. No seasonality.
#
# WE can find out with the help of Dickey Fuller test
# In[20]:
#without differentiate checking for stationary
t = adfuller(df)
if t[1] >= 0.05:
print('\nP_value {:.2f}'.format(t[1]),",", "\nstatus : It is Non-stationary\n")
else:
print('P_value {:.2f}'.format(t[1]),",", " \nstatus : It is stationary")
# In[21]:
#with 1 differentiate checking for stationary
t2 = adfuller(df.diff().dropna())
diff1 = df.diff().dropna()
if t2[1] >= 0.05:
print('\nP_value :',t2[1],",", "\nstatus : It is Non-stationary\n")
else:
print('\nP_value :',t2[1],",", "\nstatus : It is stationary")
# ## Forecasting
#
# > A.Auto ARIMA
#
# > B.Seasonal ARIMA
#
#
# ### AUTO ARIMA MODEL
# In[22]:
plt.rcParams.update({'figure.figsize':(20,5)})
#separating my series into two
#one for helping with forecasting...
#another one is for checking residuals after come out from model ie., predicted observations
train_data = df.loc[:'1989-12-31']
test_data = df.loc['1990':]
# In[23]:
# auto ARIMA which is the simplest method and the same time complicated too
# here we need to give the proper inputs to the parameters in the function
# the final output is the smallest AIC (relational distance between..)
model = pm.auto_arima(df.MT,m=12,seasonal=True,start_P=0,start_q=0,max_order=4,
test='adf',error_action='ignore',suppress_warnings=True,stepwise=True,trace=True)
model.summary()
# ### Observation :
#
# #### With auto ARIMA we can get the autoregression and Moving Average correlation points that are called PACF and ACF. The Auto ARIMA itself works meaningfully. However It is depending on the parameter values. some times it does work like it gives an irrelative predicted curve it depends on the series to different series. that time we have to make it manually I mean with ARIMA Model.
#
# #### Now coming to the point, The order is (2,0,0) and Seasonal Order (2,0,1,12) and its AIc is 332 which is a very low value and we require it. except for AR2 and ARS24 remain Ar and Ma got less than a 0.05 value which means good and getting best observations.
#
#
# # _____
# In[24]:
model.fit(train_data)
final = model.predict(n_periods=12,return_conf_int=True)
final_df = pd.DataFrame(final[0],index=test_data.index,columns=['prediction'])
plt.plot(df)
plt.plot(final_df);
print('The RMSQ -',np.sqrt(mean_squared_error(test_data,final_df)))
print(' ')
print('The MAE -', mean_absolute_error(test_data,final_df))
print(' ')
print('The MAPE -',mean_absolute_percentage_error(test_data,final_df))
# ### Observation
#
#
# #### It has worked pretty well because see the Root mean square error which is less than 1 but more than > 0.5 however see the plot we got a better turn and but at the left edge side, we predicted a little bit more.
#
# #### we can observe it. the shape of the test data series has a unique curve compared to past data series curves so that better to do keep the confidence interval.
#
# #### before that, I want to predict again with SARIMA Model.
#
# # _____________________
# ### Seasaonal ARIMA
# In[25]:
fig,axes=plt.subplots(3,3,figsize=(25,15))
axes[0,0].plot(df)
plot_pacf(df,ax=axes[0,1])
plot_acf(df,ax=axes[0,2]) #without differentiate
axes[1,0].plot(diff1)
plot_pacf(diff1,ax=axes[1,1]) #with 1 differentiate
plot_acf(diff1,ax=axes[1,2])
axes[2,0].plot(df.diff(2).dropna())
plot_pacf(df.diff(2).dropna(),ax=axes[2,1]) #with 2 differentiate
plot_acf(df.diff(2).dropna(),ax=axes[2,2]);
# ### Explanation :-
#
#
# Here ACF and PACF plots are useful for choosing the correlation between past values(AR) and Errors(MA).
#
# We need to differentiate before doing ACF and PACF then it will be made as non-stationary from stationary form. then we can forecast the observations with the help of models.
#
# So coming to the point, here I am keeping the side of the plot side by. because we can understand what different numbers we can get perfect AR and MA values.
#
# 2nd row - with 1 differentiate giving proper adequate points and also if we compare with 2 differentiate in ACF chart the lower and upper bound becoming huge and points going towards negative (over differentiate)
#
# so that I have chosen 1st differentiate
#
# AR best in (1,4,11)
#
# MA best in (6,11)
#
# D is 1
#
# # ___
#
# In[26]:
model2 = SARIMAX(train_data,order=(11,1,6),seasonal_order=(0,0,2,12)) #11,1,6,0,0,2,12 #0.517
model2_fit = model2.fit()
n_step = len(test_data)
fs = model2_fit.forecast(n_step,alpha=0.05)
forecast = model2_fit.get_forecast(n_step)
confid_int = forecast.conf_int(alpha=0.05)
fs_df = pd.Series(fs,index=test_data.index)
lower_bound = pd.Series(confid_int['lower MT'],index=test_data.index)
upper_bound =pd.Series(confid_int['upper MT'],index=test_data.index)
plt.plot(df,label='actual data',color='red')
plt.plot(fs_df,label='forecasted data',ls='dashed',color='k')
plt.fill_between(lower_bound.index,lower_bound,upper_bound,color='k',alpha=0.15)
plt.legend(loc=2)
plt.grid(axis='both',ls='dashdot')
print('The RMSQ -',np.sqrt(mean_squared_error(test_data,fs_df)))
print(' ')
print('The MAE -', mean_absolute_error(test_data,fs_df))
print(' ')
print('The MAPE -',mean_absolute_percentage_error(test_data,fs_df))
#r = a_fit.predict(start='1990-01-31',end='1990-12-31',dynamic=True)
# ### Explanation :-
#
# AR best in (1,4,11)
#
# MA best in (6,11)
#
# D is 1
#
# I tried all, however order(11,1,6) and seasonal order(0,0,2,12) has
# given a better root mean square error which is smaller than auto ARIMA's root mean square error. along with I kept confidence interval alpha =0.05 which gives
# a point estimate with a margin of error I mean in the future we can get the value in between the width of the darker shadow part on the graph.
#
# Results :
#
# Root mean square error of SARIMA :0.517 and AutoARIMA :0.587
#
# Mean absolute error of SARIMA :0.418 and AutoARIMA :0.441
#
# mean absolute percentage error :0.037 and AutoARIMA :0.040
#
#
#
# based on the model now can find further future values with confidence intervals.
#
# # ____
# In[27]:
#indepth insights About the our model
plt.rcParams.update({'figure.figsize':(20,15)})
model2_fit.plot_diagnostics();
# In[28]:
print('Root mean square error of SARIMA :{:.3f} and AutoARIMA :{:.3f}' .format(np.sqrt(mean_squared_error(test_data,fs_df)),np.sqrt(mean_squared_error(test_data,final_df))))
print(' ')
print('Mean absolute error of SARIMA :{:.3f} and AutoARIMA :{:.3f}'.format(mean_absolute_error(test_data,fs_df),mean_absolute_error(test_data,final_df)))
print(' ')
print('mean absolute percentage error :{:.3f} and AutoARIMA :{:.3f}'.format(mean_absolute_percentage_error(test_data,fs_df),mean_absolute_percentage_error(test_data,final_df)))
# In[29]:
plt.rcParams.update({'figure.figsize':(20,5)})
model2 = SARIMAX(train_data,order=(11,1,6),seasonal_order=(0,0,2,12)) #11,1,6,0,0,2,12 #0.517
model2_fit = model2.fit()
index = pd.date_range(start='1990-01-31',periods=24,freq='M')
n_step = len(index)
fs1 = model2_fit.forecast(n_step,alpha=0.05)
forecast1 = model2_fit.get_forecast(n_step)
confid_int1 = forecast1.conf_int(alpha=0.05)
fs_df1 = pd.Series(fs1,index=index)
lower_bound1 = pd.Series(confid_int1['lower MT'],index=index)
upper_bound1 =pd.Series(confid_int1['upper MT'],index=index)
plt.plot(df,label='actual data',color='red')
plt.plot(fs_df1,label='forecasted data',ls='dashed',color='k')
plt.fill_between(lower_bound1.index,lower_bound1,upper_bound1,color='k',alpha=0.15)
plt.legend(loc=2)
plt.grid(axis='both',ls='dashdot')
# ## Conclusion
# ### Finally, we could forecast the future values meaning fully( Less RMSE) Gemerally, we can predict all kinds of series. however past circles play a vital role for forecasting. we are depending on the past transaction then we can predict it.
# ### But sometimes like huge falls down and raises behavior in the series that time it will be complicated to forecast. that time we can consider like an extreme behavior.
# ### me.. that time I treat as a "single time happened" I will remove the single fluctuation. and replace with the mean value of remaining observations. I don't say it is perfect because that huge peak or extreme behavior might influence future values. that is it might be above flow or below avg flow...
# In[ ]: