Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handling linked fields #24

Open
ammsalme opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Handling linked fields #24

ammsalme opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@ammsalme
Copy link
Contributor

Merge should be configurable to handle linked (translitteration) fields correctly: ie. if a normal field and 880 field are linked together with subfield $6, the linked 880 field should be taken to preferred record only if the linked normal field is taken.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 13, 2016

Do we only need automatic copying for 880 fields when the normal fields are copied or should we also support rules that operate on 880-fields, e.g:

{
  "fields": [
    "880": {
      "action": "copy"
    }
  ]
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant