Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Emission data in Vehicle/VehicleType #763

Open
skinkie opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Emission data in Vehicle/VehicleType #763

skinkie opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement non semantic enhacement: technical enhancement, etc.
Milestone

Comments

@skinkie
Copy link
Contributor

skinkie commented Aug 5, 2024

Cerntainly mandatory from the new delegated regulation...

@skinkie skinkie added the enhancement non semantic enhacement: technical enhancement, etc. label Aug 5, 2024
@skinkie skinkie added this to the netex_2.0 milestone Aug 5, 2024
@Aurige
Copy link
Contributor

Aurige commented Aug 30, 2024

We most probably have an improvement point here, since we mainly have the EuroClass (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_emission_standards) plus FuelType, Propulsion Type and vehicle description, all non mandatory.
However I'm not sure about the best way to handle it.
For example, in France, there is an in dependant emission calculator (https://agirpourlatransition.ademe.fr/particuliers/bureau/calculer-emissions-carbone-trajets run buy ADEME to make sure that the evaluation is "neutral"). Usually, a journey planner submits a trip description (legs + vehicle characteristics) and the ADEME calculator provides the corresponding emission.
Maybe a profile (EPIP) should make mandatory to provide data necessary for such calculation.

@skinkie
Copy link
Contributor Author

skinkie commented Oct 16, 2024

It feels to me that the emission data is similar to what @duexw requested for charging and distance profiles for ev.

@Aurige Aurige modified the milestones: netex_2.0, netex_2.1 Oct 29, 2024
@Aurige
Copy link
Contributor

Aurige commented Oct 29, 2024

continue discussion for NeTEx 2.1
Can be more or less aligned with the charging process
Check https://www.svenskkollektivtrafik.se/verktyg-och-system/frida-miljo-och-fordonsdatabas/
and https://agirpourlatransition.ademe.fr/particuliers/bureau/calculer-emissions-carbone-trajets for inputs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement non semantic enhacement: technical enhancement, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants