-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Have our cake and eat it too derivation metadata #10780
Comments
Triaged in Nix maintainer meeting:
|
This issue has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2024-05-29-nix-team-meeting-minutes-148/46195/1 |
Added |
I'd still prefer to be this auxillary metadata of some sort, rather than changing the ATerm and hashing scheme just for the sake of adding metadata in there. Sure, care needs to be taken to make sure it properly traverses the places it needs to (like remote building scenarios etc), but this feels less hacky than what's proposed here. |
I don't think this is proposing any new "hackiness" that we don't already have in the form of fixed output derivations, which also excludes almost everything from the path hash. I've started collecting derivation design issues in the derivation design label. I've called it "derivation v2" briefly, but renamed it not to bias it towards a solution that may well be too heavy handed, but I do have to note that we have a number of issues that require breaking changes. An overview of related issues should help inform such decisions. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
meta
fields are not included in derivations because they would cause unnecessary rebuilds.Yet, we want users to be able to analyze this information, which isn't exposed reliably.
This lets us solve the problem of lost
meta.timeout
values in the store layer.Describe the solution you'd like
Change derivation output hashing so that a section of the
.drv
is excluded from the computation, as well as being made unobservable from the derivation's environment. This causes outputs of equivalent derivations to still happily collide onto the same output, so that output caching remains as effective as it is today.This extra info only needs to be unobservable under what we might call "equivalence under validity", an idea that we already exploit in other areas. For example, it is fundamental to fixed output derivations. An example here is
meta.timeout
: if we don't pass it to the build environment, it can not cause successful builds to have different outputs. We might even call it "equivalence under weak validity", because if a different timeout causes one derivation to fail, that's also ok.The idea of making output hashes not depend on the entire derivation is also not new; again fixed output derivations already apply this trick very effectively.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Store such information in
EvalState
, so that we don't have to change the output hashing.This causes a problem when the build happens with
nix eval + nix-store -r
, so we'd have to persist this info.However, then we can't discern between stale entries from previous evaluations and the entries we actually need.
Also it does not work without forwarding this info to remote builders somehow.
Additional context
Another output hashing change:
Priorities
Add 👍 to issues you find important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: