Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vimPlugins.clang_complete, vimPlugins.clighter8: use default `llvmPac… #279576

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

trofi
Copy link
Contributor

@trofi trofi commented Jan 8, 2024

…kages`

Old llvmPackages_6 has only two users in nixpkgs. It has a few issues like incomplete support for building pkgsLLVM.clang_6. It would be nice to remove llvmPackages_6 frm nixpkgs.

Let's switch vimPlugins to a default llvmPackages. clang_complete should work as is. Don't know about clighter8.

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

…kages`

Old `llvmPackages_6` has only two users in `nixpkgs`. It has a few
issues like incomplete support for building `pkgsLLVM.clang_6`. It would
be nice to remove `llvmPackages_6` frm `nixpkgs`.

Let's switch `vimPlugins` to a default `llvmPackages`. `clang_complete`
should work as is. Don't know about `clighter8`.
@trofi
Copy link
Contributor Author

trofi commented Jan 8, 2024

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 279576 run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages built:
  • vimPlugins.clang_complete
  • vimPlugins.clighter8

@delroth delroth added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Jan 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@philiptaron philiptaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested locally. ✅

@delroth delroth added 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two reputable people and removed 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person labels Jan 8, 2024
Copy link
Member

@wegank wegank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder how clighter8 could work given that it depends on Python 2...

@delroth delroth added 12.approvals: 3+ This PR was reviewed and approved by three or more reputable people and removed 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two reputable people labels Jan 8, 2024
@thiagokokada thiagokokada merged commit 588fb9b into NixOS:master Jan 9, 2024
29 checks passed
@trofi trofi deleted the vimPlugins-drop-llvmPackages_6 branch January 9, 2024 15:13
wegank pushed a commit to trofi/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2024
Remove all the aliases for `llvmPackages_6` except the `llvmPackages_6`
itself.

We can remove `llvmPackages_6` once last two users are gone:

- vimPlugins: NixOS#279576
- beignet: NixOS#279578
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 12.approvals: 3+ This PR was reviewed and approved by three or more reputable people
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants