Replies: 1 comment
-
This is a good idea. We weren't doing this before because of the SELFDESTRUCT opcode, but after EIP-6780 this should be a valid optimization. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
If i fork a chain at block 100, and I access 10 smart contracts they will be cached in memory and on the disk, however if I then fork block 101 the cache is invalidated and it will pull them again from the rpc even though contracts are immutable
can we have a smarter caching that invalidates less data
or am i reading it incorrectly, now upon closer inspection some files are not deleted on cache invalidation
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions