Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify how step operationId and/or workflowId should be prefixed if multiple sourceDescriptions are defined #124

Closed
frankkilcommins opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #125
Closed

Clarify how step operationId and/or workflowId should be prefixed if multiple sourceDescriptions are defined #124

frankkilcommins opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #125
Assignees
@frankkilcommins
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation implementor-draft In scope for first version

Comments

@frankkilcommins
Copy link
Collaborator

Section Step Object, field operationId

If more than one (non workflowsSpec type) source description is defined within a Workflows Description, then the operationId specified MUST be prefixed with the source name to avoid ambiguity or potential clashes.

How prefixed? Just prepend without separator character? An example would be useful.

Same with field workflowId.

Originally posted by @ralfhandl in #49 (comment)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@frankkilcommins frankkilcommins

Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation implementor-draft In scope for first version
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

clarify how to reference operationId and workflowId in case of clashes OAI/Arazzo-Specification
1 participant
@frankkilcommins