Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TSC Meeting - May 14th, 2018 - Minutes #1581

Closed
namdeirf opened this issue May 14, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

TSC Meeting - May 14th, 2018 - Minutes #1581

namdeirf opened this issue May 14, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@namdeirf
Copy link
Contributor

OpenAPI Initiative Technical Steering Committee
May 14, 2018 | 9:00 am Pacific | Videoconference

attendance

TSC Members Participants
@webron, @darrelmiller , @earth2marsh, @MikeRalphson, @whitlockjc, @usarid Erin McKean, Ted Epstein, Jonathan Stoikovitch, Phil Sturgeon, Chuck Heazel, Mike Kistler, Chris Phillips

Having achieved quorum the meeting was called to order by Ron Ratovsky at 9am. The body proceeded to consider the agenda items #1580.

The body consider the proposal in issue #1531, and without objection, the group adopted the additional tags for draft features with the explanation in italics

  • draft:proposal - we’re still hashing out the details
  • draft:pilot - go ahead and implement it
  • draft:graduated - we’ve seen the implementations, it will go into the next minor/major release
  • draft:abandoned - didn't succeed, do not use

With the approval of the agenda item, the body moved on to consider #1532. After deliberation, the body ill clarify the language regarding implementation of alternative schemas. The group will seek additional user feedback and tabled the consideration until a future meeting.

Moving on, the body considered #1564. A motion was raised to approve the HTML rendering for the OAS, without objection, Respec was approved. Support had been given to Bikeshed in online polls, but the styling advantages seen in Bikeshed could be overcome with CSS. Because Respec would be easier to maintain by @MikeRalphson , it was decided to go with Respec. An action item was taken for @darrelmiller to address registry work, @MikeRalphson to address deployment and @namdeirf to address CNAME on behalf of the Linux Foundation

Continuing on, the body considered outstanding issues to review, starting with: Clarify allowEmptyValue #1573. After consideration, the body needed more community feedback and the issue was tabled.

Having exhausted the alloted time, at 10:32am the meeting adjourned.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants