-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question about the paper (Bayesian rule) #7
Comments
Yeah, I am also curious about it. Can you explain it? Thank you! |
Hi,
What you wrote down is
Starting with Bayes rule:
P(A | B) = P(B | A)*P(A) / P(B)
Maybe the easiest way to understand it is by first considering a simplified
version of the problem in a setting without any x or D_t:
P(y_ho | y) = P(y | y_ho)*P(y_ho) / P(y)
Importantly in the above you can condition on some variable V. V does
nothing except stay in the conditional everywhere:
P(y_ho | y, V) = P(y | y_ho, V)*P(y_ho | V) / P(y | V)
(You could alternatively write P(y_ho | y, V) = P(y, V | y_ho)*P(y_ho) /
P(y, V). I think what you did is some variant of that. This is correct and
the line above is also correct.)
In our case that variable V is V = x, x_ho, Dt so we can substitute it in:
P(y_ho | y, Dt, x, x_ho) = P(y | y_ho, x, x_ho, Dt)*P(y_ho | x, x_ho, Dt) /
P(y | x, x_ho, Dt)
Sorry if I made any mistakes in writing this, it happens easily with so
many variables.
Best,
Sören
…On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:22 PM Zichun Yu ***@***.***> wrote:
Yeah, I am also curious about it. Can you explain it? Thank you!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCVMVH4JJVJN2CWYYUZMH3X3ILK7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAWX77A44>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Thank you for your detailed answer, I think i can figure out what it means. Great job & work for online data selection. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The paper is neat and novel compared to active learning, which only focuses on the unlabeled scenario. However, I cannot understand the Bayesian process. In my understanding, it should be:
Thank you for your valuable advice!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: