Fixed: Clarify Namaste requirements #263
Conversation
ahankinson
requested review from
rosy1280,
awoods,
zimeon,
julianmorley and
neilsjefferies
|
I wasn't sure how to otherwise talk about the "value of the filename that comes after the 'Number Equals' bit" in a succinct way. |
draft/spec/index.html
Outdated
| be constructed with a leading zero-equals (<code>0=</code>) string, the string <code>ocfl_object_</code>, | ||
| followed by the OCFL specification version number. For example <code>0=ocfl_object_1.0</code> for version | ||
| 1.0 of this specification. | ||
| The version declaration MUST be formatted according to the [[!NAMASTE]] specification. It MUST be an |
| @@ -349,11 +349,12 @@ <h2>Object Structure</h2> | |||
| <section id="object-conformance-declaration"> | |||
| <h2>Object Conformance Declaration</h2> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on the updated text, it would seem that the section title should now become: "Storage Root Conformance Declaration".
draft/spec/index.html
Outdated
| @@ -765,10 +766,10 @@ <h2>Root Structure</h2> | |||
| <h2>Root Conformance Declaration</h2> | |||
| <p> | |||
| The OCFL version declaration MUST be formatted according to the [[!NAMASTE]] specification. It MUST be an | |||
draft/spec/index.html
Outdated
| followed by the OCFL specification version number. For example <code>0=ocfl_object_1.0</code> for version | ||
| 1.0 of this specification. | ||
| The version declaration MUST be formatted according to the [[!NAMASTE]] specification. It MUST be an | ||
| file in the base directory of the <a>OCFL Storage Root</a> giving the OCFL version in the filename. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given the current section title, "Object Conformance Declaration", I would suggest not changing "base directory of the object" to "base directory of the OCFL Storage Root".
...unless we are no longer specifying the inclusion of a NAMASTE file in the object base.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is just a simple error, should be "OCFL Object" not "OCFL Storage Root"
draft/spec/index.html
Outdated
| followed by the OCFL specification version number. For example <code>0=ocfl_object_1.0</code> for version | ||
| 1.0 of this specification. | ||
| The version declaration MUST be formatted according to the [[!NAMASTE]] specification. It MUST be an | ||
| file in the base directory of the <a>OCFL Storage Root</a> giving the OCFL version in the filename. |
|
once changes @awoods recommends making are changed i approve. |
draft/spec/index.html
Outdated
| followed by the OCFL specification version number. For example <code>0=ocfl_object_1.0</code> for version | ||
| 1.0 of this specification. | ||
| The version declaration MUST be formatted according to the [[!NAMASTE]] specification. It MUST be an | ||
| file in the base directory of the <a>OCFL Storage Root</a> giving the OCFL version in the filename. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is just a simple error, should be "OCFL Object" not "OCFL Storage Root"
|
Refs #219 as well |
|
Errors have been fixed |
|
This can be merged now under the 72h rule. |
Fixes #261