-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed: Clarify Namaste requirements #263
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -349,11 +349,12 @@ <h2>Object Structure</h2> | |
<section id="object-conformance-declaration"> | ||
<h2>Object Conformance Declaration</h2> | ||
<p> | ||
The version declaration MUST be formatted according to the [[!NAMASTE]] specification. It MUST be an empty | ||
file in the base directory of the object giving the OCFL Object version in the filename. The filename MUST | ||
be constructed with a leading zero-equals (<code>0=</code>) string, the string <code>ocfl_object_</code>, | ||
followed by the OCFL specification version number. For example <code>0=ocfl_object_1.0</code> for version | ||
1.0 of this specification. | ||
The version declaration MUST be formatted according to the [[!NAMASTE]] specification. It MUST be an | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
file in the base directory of the <a>OCFL Storage Root</a> giving the OCFL version in the filename. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Given the current section title, "Object Conformance Declaration", I would suggest not changing "base directory of the object" to "base directory of the OCFL Storage Root". There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 👍 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this is just a simple error, should be "OCFL Object" not "OCFL Storage Root" |
||
The filename MUST conform to the pattern <code>T=dvalue</code>, where <code>T</code> MUST be 0, and | ||
<code>dvalue</code> MUST be <code>ocfl_object_</code>, followed by the OCFL specification version number. | ||
The text contents of the file MUST be the same as <code>dvalue</code>, followed by a newline | ||
(<code>\n</code>). | ||
</p> | ||
</section> | ||
|
||
|
@@ -765,10 +766,10 @@ <h2>Root Structure</h2> | |
<h2>Root Conformance Declaration</h2> | ||
<p> | ||
The OCFL version declaration MUST be formatted according to the [[!NAMASTE]] specification. It MUST be an | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
empty file in the base directory of the <a>OCFL Storage Root</a> giving the OCFL version in the filename. | ||
The filename MUST be constructed with a leading zero-equals (<code>0=</code>) string, the string | ||
<code>ocfl_</code>, followed by the OCFL specification version number. For example <code>0=ocfl_1.0</code> | ||
for version 1.0 of this specification. | ||
file in the base directory of the <a>OCFL Storage Root</a> giving the OCFL version in the filename. | ||
The filename MUST conform to the pattern <code>T=dvalue</code>, where <code>T</code> MUST be 0, and | ||
<code>dvalue</code> MUST be <code>ocfl_</code>, followed by the OCFL specification version number. The | ||
text contents of the file MUST be the same as <code>dvalue</code>, followed by a newline (<code>\n</code>). | ||
</p> | ||
<p> | ||
Root conformance indicates that the OCFL Storage Root conforms to this section (i.e. the OCFL Storage Root | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the updated text, it would seem that the section title should now become: "Storage Root Conformance Declaration".