You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
But f((2), (1), (0)) is smaller than f(f_2_1, (0)) according to X.str_cmp, which I believe may break the assumptions of AC(X). I don't understand AC(X) enough to determine if this is indeed the case or not (in particular since it looks like the pair a --> b can only be between two AC terms), but recording this for future reference.
Edit: the issue is still present with #823 applied.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With a slightly modified version of the minimal example in #474:
I get the following class representative (with
alt-ergo -d uf
):But
f((2), (1), (0))
is smaller thanf(f_2_1, (0))
according toX.str_cmp
, which I believe may break the assumptions of AC(X). I don't understand AC(X) enough to determine if this is indeed the case or not (in particular since it looks like the paira --> b
can only be between two AC terms), but recording this for future reference.Edit: the issue is still present with #823 applied.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: