You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have test the KITTI-MOT 0006 Reconstruction config. The depth estimation is similar with the Wandb log provided. The estimated depth is different from the mono depth.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your quick replay. I think utilize the sky weight on depth loss calculation is a good idea.
By the way, I have two more questions:
Does it reasonable to select rays from different images to calculate mono loss? Different image mono depth esitimate might have different scale and shift.
I notice that scale_factor is set to 0.1. Also while calculate monosdf_depth_loss, a scale and shift is applied on termination_depth. Does it necessary?
it is true that "select rays from different images to compute scale and shift" is not making too much sense for the monodepth, but overall the scale and shift is only an approximation to match monodepth with LiDAR depths. For the practical sake, this is enough because monodepths are mostly consistent in a sequence.
I didn't get your questions sry. Could you elaborate more?
I have test the KITTI-MOT 0006 Reconstruction config. The depth estimation is similar with the Wandb log provided. The estimated depth is different from the mono depth.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: