Consider/Re-think MSTG-AUTH requirements #575
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
We are doing this as part of the requirement :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Maybe we want better to offload them to the ASVS and keep only the pure mobile app ones.
This would avoid confusion regarding the levels and scope (Related to: #504). Most of the reqs. are directly related to the backend, there's less or nothing that the app can do.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions