Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why is the speaker embedding g used to condition the Posterior Encoder and the Decoder? #88

Open
st-vincent1 opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@st-vincent1
Copy link

I am confused why the speaker embedding g is used to condition multiple model components (Posterior Encoder, Decoder, Flow) as opposed to just Flow.

From the model diagram in Fig. 1 (a) (Training procedure), the speaker embedding g is used to condition the normalising Flow. This makes sense: at inference time, this information in the reversed Flow to reverse the z' distribution into a speaker-informed z which was modelled after the real data x_lin with the Posterior Encoder.

To me this seems like enough supervision, and I am confused why g is used in other places too:

  • in Posterior Encoder which uses x_lin as input, g is also supplied - but it shouldn't be needed as x_lin already contains the speaker information! (And g is not mentioned in section 2.2.2. of the paper when this encoder is discussed)
  • in Decoder, similarly, z is already informed with the speaker embedding, so why do we need to explicitly supply it here?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant