You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! As a warning: I crossposted this on neurostars on Friday nov.22 and opened a ticket on openneuro on the same day.
Problem: what the title says. I had a valid dataset published with v1.0.1, tried to update the readme due to a typo and upon creating version 1.0.2 validation has been stuck forever.
I really hope someone can help because a journal is waiting to send my paper out for publication with this dataset since friday and I have to give them a valid doi.
Many thanks for any help,
alessandra
Expected behavior
I expected the validator to quickly run and approve my minimal edit in the readme file.
Hi, this is a known bug and we'll fix it in the next deployment of OpenNeuro. With the holiday, that will almost certainly not be this week. Your DOI should be predictable, if the journal is willing to accept that. Feel free to point them to this issue to explain the delay.
Hi, this is a known bug and we'll fix it in the next deployment of OpenNeuro. With the holiday, that will almost certainly not be this week. Your DOI should be predictable, if the journal is willing to accept that. Feel free to point them to this issue to explain the delay.
thank you so much for your quick reply, it greatly helped to know it's a known bug. I will refer the journal to v.1.0.2 and to this issue.
What went wrong?
Hello! As a warning: I crossposted this on neurostars on Friday nov.22 and opened a ticket on openneuro on the same day.
Problem: what the title says. I had a valid dataset published with v1.0.1, tried to update the readme due to a typo and upon creating version 1.0.2 validation has been stuck forever.
I really hope someone can help because a journal is waiting to send my paper out for publication with this dataset since friday and I have to give them a valid doi.
Many thanks for any help,
alessandra
Expected behavior
I expected the validator to quickly run and approve my minimal edit in the readme file.
How to reproduce
See https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005613/versions/1.0.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: