- OpenSources
-Professionally curated lists of online sources, available free for public use.
- - - - - -Who we are:
- -OpenSources is a professionally curated lists of credible and non-credible online sources, available for public use. Headed by Melissa Zimdars of Merrimack College, our research team consists of professors and librarians dedicated to preserving - the integrity of information on the internet.
- -Mission:
- -Our mission is to empower people to find reliable information online.
-To this end, we provide continuously updated databases of credible and not-credible news sources for developers to leverage in the fight against fake news. Our databases are maintained by professionals who have reviewed each source, looking - for systemic inaccuracies, bias, and integrity of information.
- -Our Methods:
- -Step 1: Title/Domain Analysis. If “.wordpress” “.com.co” appear in the title -- or any slight variation on a well known website-- this is usually a sign there is a problem.
- -Step 2: About Us Analysis. Google every title/domain name/anyone listed in the “About Us” section to see if anyone has previously reported on the website (snopes, hoax-slayer, factcheck.org, etc.) or whether it has a Wikipedia page with citations - or something similar detailing its background. This is useful for identifying and correctly categorizing lesser known and/or new websites that may be on the up-and-up, such as satirical sources or websites that are explicit about their - political orientation.
- -Step 3: Source Analysis. Does the website mention/link to a study or source? Look up the source/study. Is it being accurately reflected and reported? Are officials being cited? Can a primary source be located for its quotations? Some media - literacy and critical scholars call this triangulation: Verify details, facts, quotes, etc. with multiple sources.
- -Step 4: Writing Style Analysis. Does the website follow AP Style Guide? Typically, lack of style guide use signifies questionable, more opinion-oriented practices, and may indicate an overall lack of editing or fact-checking process. Does - it frequently use ALL CAPS in headlines and/or body text? Does the headline or body of the text use phrases like "WOW!!!!"? This stylistic practice and these types of hyperbolic word choices are often used to create emotional responses - with readers that is avoided in more traditional journalism and isn’t something that would be permitted or encouraged by the AP Style Guide
- -Step 5: Aesthetic Analysis. Like the style-guide, many fake and questionable news sites utilize very bad design. Are screens are cluttered and they use heavy-handed photo-shopping or born digital images?
- -Step 6: Social Media Analysis. Look up the website on Facebook. Do the headlines and posts rely on sensational or provocative language (aka click-bait) in order to attract attention and encourage likes, click-throughs, and shares? Do the headlines - and social media descriptions match or accurately reflect the content of the linked article? (this step isn’t particularly good at helping us find fake news, but it can help us identify other misleading news sources)
- -By considering all of these areas of information we can determine which category or categories a website may occupy, although all categorizations are by necessity open to discussion and revision. For more information about analyzing the credibility - of sources, please see this resource.
- -Support or Contact
- -You can chat with our team on Gitter.
-