Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add scan-timestamp for dataloaders we know already this value (TUM poses format) #112

Closed
nachovizzo opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #120
Closed

Add scan-timestamp for dataloaders we know already this value (TUM poses format) #112

nachovizzo opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #120
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@nachovizzo
Copy link
Collaborator

We added the TUM pose format to the results of the python pipeline (#45) But we haven't extended this to all other existing datasets besides tum.

The idea is rather simple, take as an example the rosbag, rosbag2, mcap dataloaders. For each scan, we already know the timestamp of that particular sensor frame (not to be confused with point-timestamps). This is the time we recorded the scan.

We should store that value for each scan, and take advantage of the tum poses format to produce a result which is more meaningful for some applications.

@nachovizzo nachovizzo added good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant