Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Arbitrary detector for singFEL and CrystFEL #177

Open
rshopa opened this issue Nov 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Arbitrary detector for singFEL and CrystFEL #177

rshopa opened this issue Nov 28, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@rshopa
Copy link

rshopa commented Nov 28, 2019

Hi there.
I am trying to compare simulations from the same protein example 5udc.pdb given in tutorials for both SPI and nanocrystal diffraction (using singFEL and CrystFEL, respectively). I need to implement a real (arbitrary detector geometry) for the eventual simulation of dynamics for a protein, say, from cancer-/non-cancer cell. singFEL is probably the better choice, since it encompasses Xraypac.
However, the setup is different and confusing, so I've got a couple of questions:

1 - why didn't SimEx accept real detectors from CtystFEL examples, e.g. CSPAD detector geometry, as given in CrystFEL tutorial on indexamajig? The screenshots are below:
image
image

2 - How to define such detectors for singFEL? Apparently it does not support .geom-format in SingFELPhotonDiffractorParameters() function. The example from Wiki is deprecated, yet the file s2e.geom given there looks far from CrystFEL-friendly one.

3 - Am I right that the tutorial for SPI is about a tiny area from a small detector, if compared to CrystFEL simple.geom example here? Otherwise I cannot explain why the results are so different for the same 5udc.pdb protein.
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant