We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1 为什么基于Paddle的YOLOX-nano/ YOLOX-tiny/ YOLOX-m/ YOLOX-l/ YOLOX-x都有不同程度的涨点?具体修改了哪些部分? 2 为什么基于Paddle的YOLOX-s却比官方公布的降点0.1%?
https://github.com/PaddlePaddle/PaddleDetection/issues/new?assignees=&labels=type%2Fquestion%2Cstatus%2Fnew-issue&template=4_ask-a-question.yml
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
照着megvii原版复现的。按照作者意见,改了ema_decay=0.9999,Megvii-BaseDetection/YOLOX#735 ,0.1 mAP的diff是正常现象。
Sorry, something went wrong.
按照您给的issue链接,ema_decay从0.9998改为0.9999,您这面的total batchsize是多少?128还是64?为什么YOLOX-nano/ YOLOX-tiny/ YOLOX-m/ YOLOX-l/ YOLOX-x都有不同程度的涨点?
ppdet yolox coco模型的总bs都是64
No branches or pull requests
问题确认 Search before asking
请提出你的问题 Please ask your question
1 为什么基于Paddle的YOLOX-nano/ YOLOX-tiny/ YOLOX-m/ YOLOX-l/ YOLOX-x都有不同程度的涨点?具体修改了哪些部分?
2 为什么基于Paddle的YOLOX-s却比官方公布的降点0.1%?
https://github.com/PaddlePaddle/PaddleDetection/issues/new?assignees=&labels=type%2Fquestion%2Cstatus%2Fnew-issue&template=4_ask-a-question.yml
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: