refactor:vitest to MemberDetailScreen #2662
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on refactoring the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (2)📓 Common learningssrc/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.spec.tsx (1)🔇 Additional comments (4)src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.spec.tsx (4)
The mock declarations have been correctly migrated from Jest to Vitest, maintaining the same functionality while following Vitest's syntax. The documentation comments provide clear context for each mock's purpose. Also applies to: 48-78
The global alert mock and afterEach cleanup have been properly migrated to use Vitest's functions. Line range hint The test implementations have been properly migrated to use Vitest's mocking functions while maintaining the same test coverage and assertions. Also applies to: 250-250 Line range hint Let's ensure no Jest references remain in the codebase. ✅ Verification successfulMigration to Vitest is complete and correct The verification shows that:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining Jest references in the test file
# Expected: No occurrences of 'jest.' in the code
echo "Checking for remaining Jest references..."
rg 'jest\.' src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.spec.tsx
echo "Checking for potentially missed Jest imports..."
rg -i 'jest' src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.spec.tsx
Length of output: 318 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for any testing framework references
echo "Checking for testing framework imports and usage..."
rg -A 2 "@jest|@testing-library|expect|describe|test|it\(" src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.spec.tsx
echo "Checking for specific test setup patterns..."
rg -A 2 "beforeAll|afterAll|beforeEach|afterEach" src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.spec.tsx
echo "Checking for mock patterns..."
rg "mock\(|vi\." src/screens/MemberDetail/MemberDetail.spec.tsx
Length of output: 9192 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Added Vitest to MemberDetail Screen
Issue Number: 2556
Fixes #2556
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Migrated the testing framework to Vitest.
Updated all test files and configurations to be compatible with Vitest's syntax and features.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit