Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding a role scenario test for issue 827 #878

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2016
Merged

Adding a role scenario test for issue 827 #878

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2016

Conversation

gfosco
Copy link
Contributor

@gfosco gfosco commented Mar 7, 2016

and #683.. there were multiple things discussed so I'm not 100% sure I've distilled it correctly, but I don't see any issues with these types of role permissions in the current codebase.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 91.74%

Merging #878 into master will not affect coverage as of 8ea6514

@@            master    #878   diff @@
======================================
  Files           71      71       
  Stmts         4108    4108       
  Branches       849     849       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
  Hit           3769    3769       
  Partial         10      10       
  Missed         329     329       

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 8ea6514

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

gfosco added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2016
Adding a role scenario test for issue 827
@gfosco gfosco merged commit 2e8f349 into master Mar 7, 2016
@gfosco gfosco deleted the fosco.roles827 branch March 7, 2016 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants