Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Upgrade @types/koa from 2.13.1 to 2.13.4 #79

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 26, 2022

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade @types/koa from 2.13.1 to 2.13.4.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 3 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 10 months ago, on 2021-07-06.
Release notes
Package name: @types/koa
  • 2.13.4 - 2021-07-06
  • 2.13.3 - 2021-05-28
  • 2.13.2 - 2021-05-27
  • 2.13.1 - 2021-03-04
from @types/koa GitHub release notes

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@kobik kobik changed the title [Snyk] Upgrade @types/koa from 2.13.1 to 2.13.4 refactor:Upgrade @types/koa from 2.13.1 to 2.13.4 Jun 26, 2022
@kobik kobik changed the title refactor:Upgrade @types/koa from 2.13.1 to 2.13.4 refactor: Upgrade @types/koa from 2.13.1 to 2.13.4 Jun 26, 2022
@kobik kobik merged commit 9e6eef4 into master Jun 26, 2022
@kobik kobik deleted the snyk-upgrade-bc922685affdfc9e597342b28e7f5041 branch June 26, 2022 13:41
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 3, 2022

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.2.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants