You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@mattcieslak mentioned today that the preps use RAS+, while FSL typically uses LAS+, and FSL isn't great at checking that orientations match. It's possible that prep preprocessing could force the orientation is RAS+, but the raw data might still be in LAS+ and any FSL-specific steps that use both images could ignore the orientation mismatch.
ASLPrep might already have a step that does this. I'll need to dig into the code to make sure.
Additional details
Next steps
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary
@mattcieslak mentioned today that the preps use RAS+, while FSL typically uses LAS+, and FSL isn't great at checking that orientations match. It's possible that prep preprocessing could force the orientation is RAS+, but the raw data might still be in LAS+ and any FSL-specific steps that use both images could ignore the orientation mismatch.
ASLPrep might already have a step that does this. I'll need to dig into the code to make sure.
Additional details
Next steps
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: