We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Any chance of incorporating the following .patch for allow WASAPI loopback recording?
https://github.com/audacity/audacity/blob/e6fb57300171c8e704f56e9bbaa5df10b05f5cfe/lib-src/portaudio-v19/wasapi-loopback.patch
The inclusion of this functionality into portaudio would resolve spatialaudio/portaudio-binaries#6 spatialaudio/python-sounddevice#287 spatialaudio/python-sounddevice#14 and many others - portaudio bindings are the only real option for python and the lack of loopback recording has always been the biggest issue for any project in python.
I've had a look through old PR's and Issues and can't see this one raised - apologies if I've missed it.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @shauneccles! Yes, why not. Someone needs to provide the PR for it and if all works as expected it can be applied.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Closed by #672
Thank you so much for this feature! This is fantastic.
dmitrykos
No branches or pull requests
Any chance of incorporating the following .patch for allow WASAPI loopback recording?
https://github.com/audacity/audacity/blob/e6fb57300171c8e704f56e9bbaa5df10b05f5cfe/lib-src/portaudio-v19/wasapi-loopback.patch
The inclusion of this functionality into portaudio would resolve spatialaudio/portaudio-binaries#6 spatialaudio/python-sounddevice#287 spatialaudio/python-sounddevice#14 and many others - portaudio bindings are the only real option for python and the lack of loopback recording has always been the biggest issue for any project in python.
I've had a look through old PR's and Issues and can't see this one raised - apologies if I've missed it.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: