Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make changes to rely on ADL get instead of std::get in AFQMC #5239

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

ye-luo
Copy link
Contributor

@ye-luo ye-luo commented Nov 21, 2024

Proposed changes

Namely restore part of #5228 without update of multi.

What type(s) of changes does this code introduce?

  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • No

What systems has this change been tested on?

laptop

Checklist

  • Yes. This PR is up to date with current the current state of 'develop'

@ye-luo
Copy link
Contributor Author

ye-luo commented Nov 21, 2024

Test this please

@correaa
Copy link
Contributor

correaa commented Nov 21, 2024

This is the list of errors I see in the CI so far:

I see this one passing for what it is worth:

  • ornl-sulfur CI GCC11-MPI-MKL-AFQMC-Complex-Mixed

@ye-luo
Copy link
Contributor Author

ye-luo commented Nov 21, 2024

Test this please

@ye-luo
Copy link
Contributor Author

ye-luo commented Nov 21, 2024

@correaa AFQMC update seems good.

@correaa
Copy link
Contributor

correaa commented Nov 22, 2024

ok, so it is possible to merge then? I will keep working on the side to make the complex afqmc work with newer versions of Multi. But at least I can keep developing Multi without breaking the real version (and the rest of the code).

@ye-luo ye-luo merged commit 802b0e9 into QMCPACK:develop Nov 22, 2024
42 of 43 checks passed
@prckent
Copy link
Contributor

prckent commented Nov 22, 2024

After this PR and those related to it on Thursday, the nightly tests are clear.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants