Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 10, 2018. It is now read-only.

qupzilla should display his own repo in github correct #1350

Closed
agaida opened this issue May 15, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

qupzilla should display his own repo in github correct #1350

agaida opened this issue May 15, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@agaida
Copy link
Contributor

agaida commented May 15, 2014

otherwise this brower make no sense - Really, this must be a joke, Please try to select a branch or a tag in the github qupzilla repo. This should work in every case, using a browser that is not able to show his own repository is some kind of nuts.

qupzilla behavior: http://i.imgur.com/n0ramCK.jpg
expected behavior: https://mediacru.sh/2bJhspITNQdm.jpg

@pejakm
Copy link
Member

pejakm commented May 15, 2014

I really don't like your tone, so I'm not going to explain why I'm closing this.
Duplicate of #1204.

@pejakm pejakm closed this as completed May 15, 2014
@pejakm pejakm added Qt labels May 15, 2014
@agaida
Copy link
Contributor Author

agaida commented May 17, 2014

I really don't like the reaction - but it's not my problem anymore. Solving bugs would be a proper way to handle problems. And it is nuts to mark a bug as duplicate of another closed unfixed bug.

@nowrep
Copy link
Member

nowrep commented May 17, 2014

This is issue in rendering engine = QtWebKit. There is unfortunately nothing we can do about it in QupZilla code.
The fact that Debain (even unstable) have very old (~ 2years) version of QtWebKit doesn't help either.

@agaida
Copy link
Contributor Author

agaida commented May 17, 2014

Fact is, that we don't use debians qt webkit - for just that reason. Atm we use 2.3.3 instead 2.2.1. Sorry for beeing harsh, but there should be a workaroud - i've no problems to compile qupzilla with Qt5 if this would help.

@nowrep
Copy link
Member

nowrep commented May 17, 2014

Oh, and one last thing. It actually is already fixed:

qt-github

This is with Qt 5.3

@agaida
Copy link
Contributor Author

agaida commented May 17, 2014

Ah - ok. Will check this out

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants