Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 10, 2018. It is now read-only.

Request: Bookmarks readable for Nepomuk and related services #17

Closed
johnmagnus opened this issue Oct 20, 2011 · 7 comments
Closed

Request: Bookmarks readable for Nepomuk and related services #17

johnmagnus opened this issue Oct 20, 2011 · 7 comments

Comments

@johnmagnus
Copy link

In rekonq / konqueror one of the features I really enjoy is the ability to search for bookmarks outside the browser. Fire up krunner and type thus launching the browser and said site.

Would this be doable within the framework of the existing bookmark manager?

@nowrep
Copy link
Member

nowrep commented Oct 20, 2011

From the quick reading Nepomuk documentation, it should be possible and I think it should be quite easy.
But unfortunately as I am not KDE user, this feature is not high priority for me right now.
I am now working on search engines and importing bookmarks from other browsers, so this won't land in QupZilla this, nor next month.
I'd be happy, if someone contribute
When I am free, I will surely try to implement it.

@ghost ghost assigned nowrep Oct 20, 2011
@johnmagnus
Copy link
Author

No rush. Now that it's out there, take it in time. I'll gladly help out as best as I can, though code I cannot :(

@nowrep
Copy link
Member

nowrep commented Oct 20, 2011

No problem, I very appreciate your interest and help :-)
Even if reporting bugs looks like a small thing, it really helps me a lot. Feel free to report even a smallest thing you'd like to change ;-)

@JHooverman
Copy link
Member

Will implementing this feature add dependencies to kde libraries to qupzilla code?

@nowrep
Copy link
Member

nowrep commented Oct 22, 2011

Yes, it will, but it is also possible to compile with Nepomuk support only for KDE, so that's ok :-)

@JHooverman
Copy link
Member

To add an compile option for this is definitely ok. I was just afraid, that adding kde dependencies might blow up qupzilla code will lead to a "non-lightweight" feature ;-)

@nowrep
Copy link
Member

nowrep commented Jul 14, 2012

Merged into #458.

@nowrep nowrep closed this as completed Jul 14, 2012
@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Oct 21, 2014
@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Aug 14, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants