Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Consider adding additional information to the User model #307

Open
atruskie opened this issue Nov 30, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Feature: Consider adding additional information to the User model #307

atruskie opened this issue Nov 30, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@atruskie
Copy link
Member

atruskie commented Nov 30, 2016

We are beginning to need more information about our users:

We typically avoid asking for more information from users because it requires our security standards to be higher and introduced a higher risk of sensitive information being leaked in the case of a hack, or even inadvertently through careless data sharing. The best policy with all sensitive information is to simply not store it.

This proposal considers adding the following fields to the user model:

  • [optional] Given name
  • [optional] Middle names
  • [optional] Surname
  • [optional] Association/Institution

They will be preceded by a warning explaining that we will use that information in a public manner (other users will be able to see it) and also according to our ethics guided research policies. [EDIT:] The description will include a description that describes how we will use the information, for example, for automated citation generation and collaborating with researchers, along with an emphasis that filling out the fields is optional.

What are people's thoughts on this?

@JessieLOliver
Copy link

In addition to adding the the information about public use and our policies, it is also important to include and highlight why this information is very helpful for our research... otherwise, why would anyone add the information?

@atruskie
Copy link
Member Author

atruskie commented Dec 1, 2016

@JessCappadonna updated the proposal, see the [EDIT] above

@KarlinaInd
Copy link

Sounds like a good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants