Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Network Stack High layers #7894

Closed
1 of 8 tasks
kYc0o opened this issue Oct 27, 2017 · 10 comments
Closed
1 of 8 tasks

Network Stack High layers #7894

kYc0o opened this issue Oct 27, 2017 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
Area: network Area: Networking Community: help wanted The contributors require help from other members of the community State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days State: WIP State: The PR is still work-in-progress and its code is not in its final presentable form yet

Comments

@kYc0o
Copy link
Contributor

kYc0o commented Oct 27, 2017

Fix lingering NDP issues

ICN stack support clean-up

Discuss mid- and long-term plans for network stack maintenance & development (GNRC vs other supported stacks)

  • Related issues
    • [ ]

Support for CoAP blockwise transfer, observe

Revisit network time synchronization

  • Related issues
    • [ ]
@kYc0o kYc0o added GNRC Community: help wanted The contributors require help from other members of the community Area: network Area: Networking State: WIP State: The PR is still work-in-progress and its code is not in its final presentable form yet labels Oct 27, 2017
@miri64
Copy link
Member

miri64 commented Oct 27, 2017

What is this issue? Is this a copy of the Roadmap? I'm confused :-/

@kYc0o
Copy link
Contributor Author

kYc0o commented Oct 27, 2017

Yes, it's a step forward the organisation for the meetings.

@miri64
Copy link
Member

miri64 commented Oct 27, 2017

I'm not sure if having 9 issues for 1 meeting is scaling so well...

@miri64
Copy link
Member

miri64 commented Oct 27, 2017

One point is actually outdated (sorry for not updating the Roadmap): conn was deleted in April.

@miri64
Copy link
Member

miri64 commented Oct 27, 2017

(adapted the issue and the roadmap)

@kYc0o
Copy link
Contributor Author

kYc0o commented Oct 27, 2017

I'm not sure if having 9 issues for 1 meeting is scaling so well...

No that's not the point, I'll send an email to explain.

@tcschmidt
Copy link
Member

I guess we can close this one - correct?

@kYc0o
Copy link
Contributor Author

kYc0o commented Jun 26, 2018

I'm not sure, I need to check if all issues are solved, though I guess there are more... I need rather to update all the related issues to reflect the ongoing work.

@kb2ma
Copy link
Member

kb2ma commented Jun 26, 2018

I maintain some pages for CoAP, which are referenced from the overall Roadmap page. #9309 is a pretty good summary of current state.

@miri64 miri64 removed the GNRC label Oct 5, 2018
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 10, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you want me to ignore this issue, please mark it with the "State: don't stale" label. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days label Aug 10, 2019
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: network Area: Networking Community: help wanted The contributors require help from other members of the community State: stale State: The issue / PR has no activity for >185 days State: WIP State: The PR is still work-in-progress and its code is not in its final presentable form yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants