You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As the title says Google Style Guide for C++ is fairly detailed down to how to name methods and class members. I personally don't agree with everything it has to offer but I'm hoping that we can all agree to use it so that we don't need to have any code style discussions.
Another goal is to improve the quality of the code (in addition to style) in terms of abstraction, robustness and performance (The style guide has a small number of recommendations on that front).
We can also make agreed upon deviations from the style guide when necessary as long as we document it here or some other document.
As the title says Google Style Guide for C++ is fairly detailed down to how to name methods and class members. I personally don't agree with everything it has to offer but I'm hoping that we can all agree to use it so that we don't need to have any code style discussions.
Another goal is to improve the quality of the code (in addition to style) in terms of abstraction, robustness and performance (The style guide has a small number of recommendations on that front).
We can also make agreed upon deviations from the style guide when necessary as long as we document it here or some other document.
@junliume @JehandadKhan @CAHEK7 @DrizztDoUrden @averinevg @atamazov @cderb @iq136boy @bghimireamd : please share your opinion. CC: @ROCmSoftwarePlatform/miopen-devs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: