Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestions for skills/skill categories to add to the framework #39

Open
hareball90 opened this issue Sep 6, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@hareball90
Copy link
Contributor

Consider including Security (and subsets) and Data Management (and subsets)?

@elichad
Copy link
Collaborator

elichad commented Sep 6, 2023

Also: Accessibility (for disabled users). In the original discussions at CW I thought this might be covered by other competencies around best practices, but I think it can stand alone as it's often overlooked

@elichad
Copy link
Collaborator

elichad commented Sep 6, 2023

  • Networking (security)

@elichad elichad changed the title Add new skill categories Suggestions for skills/skill categories to add to the framework Sep 20, 2023
@sbland
Copy link
Collaborator

sbland commented Oct 13, 2023

I second the data management. We have been asked if this is a competency of our RSE team by researchers.
Also just dropping a link to the current list here https://github.com/RSEToolkit/rse-competencies-toolkit/blob/main/_data/skills.json

@sbland
Copy link
Collaborator

sbland commented Nov 20, 2023

Some categories could have additional useful granularity.
I.e. HPC usage.

{
    "HPC Usage":  [
        "HPC Tier 1",
        "HPC Tier 2",
        "HPC Tier 3",
        "GPU HPC Tier 1",
        "GPU HPC Tier 2",
        "GPU HPC Tier 3",
    ]
}

The current skills.json is a bit limited for storing this kind of additional useful info. Is it worth expanding the lists into a list of objects at some point? Or storing separately?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants