Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] How to prepare data as Session-Based Recommendation settings? #766

Closed
johnny12150 opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@johnny12150
Copy link

I am aware that for the moment sequential models don’t support split ratio and benchmark files.
Therefore, my question is that what’s the workaround for me to achieve the same as general session based or next-item recommendations do.

  • Spilt train and test in certain amount or prepared files
  • Set whether to use data augmentation in training

For the second setting, is it possible to just comment out the augmentation parts used in data_prepared?

@2017pxy
Copy link
Member

2017pxy commented Mar 16, 2021

@johnny12150 I am sorry to tell you that these two requirements are not supported for our session-based recommendation models either, since our architecture of session-based recommendation models is as same as the sequential models'. In fact, in RecBole we all recognize them as sequential recommendation models.

@2017pxy 2017pxy self-assigned this Mar 16, 2021
@2017pxy 2017pxy added the question Further information is requested label Mar 16, 2021
@johnny12150
Copy link
Author

Oh! That's unfortunate to hear that.
Is there any plan to supported the next-item-based recommendation settings?

@2017pxy
Copy link
Member

2017pxy commented Mar 16, 2021

@johnny12150 We will carefully consider about this in near future, thx.

@johnny12150
Copy link
Author

Is Set whether to use data augmentation in training still not available yet?

@hyp1231
Copy link
Member

hyp1231 commented Sep 22, 2021

Is Set whether to use data augmentation in training still not available yet?

Sorry for the delayed reply. @johnny12150
FYI, an example can be found in session-based benchmarking, where no data augmentation is performed in RecBole and interactions with preprocessed item sequences are loaded.

@2017pxy 2017pxy closed this as completed Feb 25, 2022
@Sherry-XLL Sherry-XLL added benchmark and removed question Further information is requested labels Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants