Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix demo libtorch error #420

Merged

Conversation

jedi007
Copy link
Contributor

@jedi007 jedi007 commented Apr 11, 2022

This line of code ("auto outputs = this->Net.forward({input}).toTuple();") caused a crash.

Maybe it's ok in old version.But it's not Tuple now.

This line of code ("auto outputs = this->Net.forward({input}).toTuple();") caused a crash.

Maybe it's ok in old version.But it's not Tuple now.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #420 (9692806) into main (3cda376) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #420      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.25%   74.20%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          66       66              
  Lines        4459     4459              
  Branches      756      756              
==========================================
- Hits         3311     3309       -2     
- Misses        969      970       +1     
- Partials      179      180       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.20% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
nanodet/data/transform/warp.py 84.48% <0.00%> (-1.15%) ⬇️

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

@RangiLyu RangiLyu changed the base branch from main to jedi007/fix_demo_libtorch August 26, 2022 06:58
@RangiLyu RangiLyu merged commit 6797732 into RangiLyu:jedi007/fix_demo_libtorch Aug 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants