Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve readability of confusion matrix plot #4967

Closed
2 tasks
degiz opened this issue Dec 13, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed
2 tasks

Improve readability of confusion matrix plot #4967

degiz opened this issue Dec 13, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
area:rasa-oss 🎡 Anything related to the open source Rasa framework area:rasa-oss/model-testing Issues focused around testing models (e.g. via `rasa test`) type:discussion 👨‍👧‍👦 Early stage of an idea or validation of thoughts. Should NOT be closed by PR. type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR

Comments

@degiz
Copy link
Contributor

degiz commented Dec 13, 2019

Description of Problem: Originally proposed by @Ghostvv in #3549

Confusion matrix is unreadable (at least for core), color boxes and numbers are not aligned, also numbers overlay:

Overview of the Solution: Come up with proposal on how to improve readability of the plot

Definition of Done:

  • Tests are added
  • Feature mentioned in the changlog
@degiz degiz added the type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR label Dec 13, 2019
@sara-tagger
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for submitting this feature request 🚀@akelad will get back to you about it soon!✨

@erohmensing
Copy link
Contributor

Oops I guess I haven't added you to the tagger yet, it doesn't know you're one of us 😃

@wochinge wochinge added the area:rasa-oss 🎡 Anything related to the open source Rasa framework label Dec 19, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 18, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the status:stale label Mar 18, 2020
@ricwo ricwo added the type:discussion 👨‍👧‍👦 Early stage of an idea or validation of thoughts. Should NOT be closed by PR. label Apr 3, 2020
@alwx alwx added the area:rasa-oss/model-testing Issues focused around testing models (e.g. via `rasa test`) label Jan 29, 2021
@rasabot-exalate rasabot-exalate added area:rasa-oss :ferris wheel: area:rasa-oss 🎡 Anything related to the open source Rasa framework type:discussion 👨‍👧‍👦 Early stage of an idea or validation of thoughts. Should NOT be closed by PR. type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR and removed type:discussion 👨‍👧‍👦 Early stage of an idea or validation of thoughts. Should NOT be closed by PR. area:rasa-oss 🎡 Anything related to the open source Rasa framework type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR area:rasa-oss :ferris wheel: labels Mar 17, 2022 — with Exalate Issue Sync
@sync-by-unito
Copy link

sync-by-unito bot commented Dec 19, 2022

➤ Maxime Verger commented:

💡 Heads up! We're moving issues to Jira: https://rasa-open-source.atlassian.net/browse/OSS.

From now on, this Jira board is the place where you can browse (without an account) and create issues (you'll need a free Jira account for that). This GitHub issue has already been migrated to Jira and will be closed on January 9th, 2023. Do not forget to subscribe to the corresponding Jira issue!

➡️ More information in the forum: https://forum.rasa.com/t/migration-of-rasa-oss-issues-to-jira/56569.

@m-vdb m-vdb closed this as completed Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:rasa-oss 🎡 Anything related to the open source Rasa framework area:rasa-oss/model-testing Issues focused around testing models (e.g. via `rasa test`) type:discussion 👨‍👧‍👦 Early stage of an idea or validation of thoughts. Should NOT be closed by PR. type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants