Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prepared release of version 1.9.3 #5512

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 27, 2020
Merged

prepared release of version 1.9.3 #5512

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 27, 2020

Conversation

dakshvar22
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes:

Status (please check what you already did):

  • added some tests for the functionality
  • updated the documentation
  • updated the changelog (please check changelog for instructions)
  • reformat files using black (please check Readme for instructions)

@dakshvar22 dakshvar22 requested a review from Ghostvv March 27, 2020 10:26

Bugfixes
--------
- `#5505 <https://github.com/rasahq/rasa/issues/5505>`_: Set default value for ``weight_sparsity`` in ``ResponseSelector`` to ``0``.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we make this clearer that it fixes the response selector, so that poeple know that if they're using it they should be on this version?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@erohmensing Makes sense, this was added in #5505. Can I make it clearer by changing the CHANGELOG.rst directly in this branch itself?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some explanation below.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dakshvar22 maybe if it is used in their pipeline? or if they have responses?

just bc the default pipeline has included it since 1.8 regardless of if the user is using it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@dakshvar22 dakshvar22 requested a review from erohmensing March 27, 2020 10:50
Copy link
Contributor

@erohmensing erohmensing left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, changelog looks great

@dakshvar22 dakshvar22 merged commit 805de56 into 1.9.x Mar 27, 2020
@dakshvar22 dakshvar22 deleted the prepare-release-1.9.3 branch March 27, 2020 11:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants