Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(Object.assign): stop polyfilling Object assign #2080

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2016
Merged

fix(Object.assign): stop polyfilling Object assign #2080

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2016

Conversation

benlesh
Copy link
Member

@benlesh benlesh commented Oct 25, 2016

Description:

Related issue (if exists):

RxJS should not be responsible for polyfilling Object.assign.
This should also increase code coverage around the alternate method used for assign

BREAKING CHANGE: RxJS will no longer polyfill Object.assign. It does
not require Object.assign to function, however, your code may be
inadvertently relying on this polyfill.

RxJS should not be responsible for polyfilling `Object.assign`.
This should also increase code coverage around the alternate method used for assign

BREAKING CHANGE: RxJS will no longer polyfill `Object.assign`. It does
not require `Object.assign` to function, however, your code may be
inadvertently relying on this polyfill.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 26, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 97.411% when pulling acbf6cc on blesh:assign into 0271fab on ReactiveX:master.

@jayphelps
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@jayphelps jayphelps merged commit b5f8ab3 into ReactiveX:master Nov 4, 2016
@benlesh benlesh deleted the assign branch December 16, 2016 03:08
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 6, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants